Ep. 350: Rorty on Justification and Essentialism (Part One)
Sep 16, 2024
auto_awesome
Philosopher Richard Rorty, known for his influential thoughts on pragmatism and anti-authoritarianism, dives into powerful ideas about democracy and truth. He argues that we don't need absolute truths to justify democratic values. Rorty dismisses the distinction between essential and accidental properties, proposing that everything is defined by its relations. The conversation also humorously navigates the divide between continental and analytic philosophies, championing a shift toward pan-relationalism to understand reality.
Rorty asserts that democracy can be justified without reference to absolute truths, highlighting its contextual and relational nature.
The critique of essentialism emphasizes that object identity stems from relationships and interactions rather than fixed intrinsic properties.
Deep dives
Truth and Relationalism in Pragmatism
Pragmatism challenges traditional notions of truth, suggesting that truth should not be viewed as an objective, fixed entity. Instead, it posits that truth is inherently contextual and closely tied to practical implications. For pragmatists, such as Rorty, the significance of a statement lies in its effectiveness in practice rather than its adherence to an absolute standard of truth. This idea draws attention to the interconnectedness of beliefs and practices and questions whether the pursuit of abstract, universal truths is meaningful within a pragmatic framework.
Critique of Essentialism
The episode critiques the concept of essentialism, emphasizing that objects cannot be defined by intrinsic properties alone. Instead, every object's identity is shaped by its relationships and interactions with other entities. Rorty's perspective challenges the belief that we must discover a foundational essence underlying reality, suggesting that focusing solely on properties leads to arbitrary distinctions. In the discourse, examples such as numbers illustrate that no relational quality should be deemed more essential than others, promoting a view of objects as networks of relations.
The Role of Education in Democratic Engagement
Education is framed as a critical mechanism for fostering democratic ideals and engagement, raising questions about how to effectively communicate these values. Rorty suggests that rational persuasion alone may not be effective for those resistant to democratic principles. Instead, a deeper transformation through education is necessary—one that seeks to cultivate empathy and understanding rather than simply presenting facts. This highlights the complexities of promoting democracy in a polarized environment and the importance of appealing to shared human experiences.
Causal Relationships and Knowledge
The episode discusses the role of causal relationships in establishing knowledge, arguing that all understanding stems from our interactions with the world rather than a direct acquaintance with objects. It posits that while we may perceive qualities and properties of objects, our grasp of them is fundamentally relational. This raises the debate over whether knowledge can exist independently of linguistic or conceptual frameworks, suggesting instead that understanding is inextricably linked to relational dynamics. The discussion underscores the limitations of traditional epistemology, emphasizing that knowledge emerges from a complex web of interactions rather than isolated truths.
On "Universality and Truth" and "Pan-Relationalism," which are lectures 3-5 in Richard Rorty's Pragmatism As Anti-Authoritarianism.
How do we justify democracy? Rorty says we don't have to refer to transcendent Truth or Good to do this. He also denies the disinction between essential and accidental properties, and in fact between substance and property: Everything is just described in terms of its relations to other things, and which relations are important are not intrinsic to the thing, but a matter of a speaker's purposes.