Reformed Forum Chad Van Dixhoorn | Collaboration, Consensus, and Compromise: Lessons from the Westminster Assembly
Nov 21, 2025
Chad Van Dixhoorn, a historian and professor at Reformed Theological Seminary, shares insights on the Westminster Assembly's pursuit of theological clarity through collaboration. He emphasizes that the Westminster Confession embodies compromise without being a compromise document. The conversation touches on the importance of respectful debate, the varied tones of confession chapters, and the need for confessions to unite rather than constantly be rewritten. Van Dixhoorn also discusses doctrinal preaching and the balance between scriptural authority and catechism-based teachings.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Collaboration Over Consensus
- The Westminster Assembly favored collaboration over forced consensus during drafting.
- Their final act functioned as a corporate confirmation rather than unanimous agreement.
Deliberative Process And Few Formal Votes
- Committees allowed dissenters to speak, yet most decisions passed with minimal formal votes.
- Many debates fizzled after discussion and only a few matters required counted votes.
Humility And Respect Shaped Debate
- The divines were generally humble and respectful, shaping minds rather than entrenching disagreement.
- Heated insults were rare and often apologized for, showing a civil debate culture.
