BONUS: Hangin' out with Eiynah 4 - Russell Brand, Patriarchy, etc - with Dr Caitlin Green
Sep 21, 2023
auto_awesome
Dr Caitlin Moriah, expert on gender criticals, joins the podcast to discuss Russell Brand, reactions to his allegations, hypocrisy in right-wing defenders, demand for legal proof, feminists in the TERF community, obfuscation through confession, whistleblowing on big pharma, Douglas Murray's take on Brand, guilt by association, normalizing rape in society, right-wing hypocrisy, flawed reasoning, criticism of Bowbert, parental positioning, and doublethink.
The response to Russell Brand's controversies reveals complexities in political affiliations and the fragility of holding influential figures accountable.
The controversy surrounding Russell Brand's alleged sexual assaults highlights the manipulation of language and ideologies to shift responsibility and create false narratives.
The propensity for hero worship and the cult of genius perpetuates a mental defense mechanism that limits critical thinking and protects offenders within patriarchal structures.
Deep dives
Russell Brand's Allegations and Right-Wing Hypocrisy
Russell Brand is embroiled in controversy as horrific allegations have surfaced regarding his alleged sexual assault and abuse of multiple women. Despite evidence and complaints to the police, right-wing figures have rallied to Brand's defense, highlighting the hypocrisy of those who accuse others of grooming while defending an actual groomer. The gender critical space has been divided over this issue, with some feminists condemning Brand's actions, supporting the victims, and pointing out the flaws in the due process arguments made by their male allies. The controversy also highlights the usage of legalistic definitions in public opinion, and the dissonance between court processes and societal perceptions of guilt. The response to these allegations reveals the complexities of political affiliations and the fragility of holding influential figures accountable.
The Manipulation of Gender Ideologies in the Brand Controversy
The controversy surrounding Russell Brand's alleged sexual assaults has led to discussions about gender ideologies and their influence in interpreting and reacting to such allegations. Some individuals within the gender critical space have attempted to blame gender ideologies for the behavior of Brand and other alleged abusers, even though their actions are unrelated to gender identity or transgender issues. This attributing of blame to gender ideologies is driven by an attempt to divert attention away from the actions of the accused and discredit movements advocating for gender equality and acceptance. The controversy serves as a stark reminder of the manipulation of language and ideologies to shift responsibility and create false narratives.
Mixed Responses and Ambiguities Surrounding Brand's Politics
The response to Russell Brand's controversies has revealed the diverse and sometimes contradictory viewpoints within the media and political landscape. There is disagreement among commentators about Brand's political leanings and intentions, with some acknowledging his past left-wing activism and others claiming he has shifted towards right-wing ideologies. Brand's ability to blur boundaries and align himself with various ideological positions has generated confusion and controversy. This ambiguity highlights the dangers of interpreting political allegiances based solely on surface-level appearances or individual associations. It emphasizes the need for critical examination and nuanced understanding of an individual's beliefs and actions.
Ben Shapiro and Right-Wing Hypocrisy Regarding Brand
Ben Shapiro's response to Russell Brand's allegations highlights the hypocrisy within some right-wing circles. Shapiro attempts to downplay the seriousness of the allegations by questioning the evidence and timing of the accusations. He portrays himself as a friend of Brand, dismissing the gravity of the accusations and implying brand's innocence based on his personal relationship. Shapiro's defense falls in line with the selective and inconsistent application of moral standards within these circles, where allegations are dismissed or diminished when the accused aligns politically or socially with the right. This further exposes the tendency to prioritize loyalty and ideological alignment over accountability and justice.
Defending Awful People: Navigating Tribalism and Hero Worship
There is a tendency to defend and celebrate individuals who have committed terrible acts, which raises questions about where to draw the line when it comes to moral judgments. The fear of dismantling entire ideological frameworks and national mythologies often drives the defense of these individuals. The concept of tribalism is invoked as a means to justify such defenses, but it overlooks the fact that rape and other crimes are inherently wrong and should be condemned. Historical figures like Thomas Jefferson are also brought into the discussion, highlighting the challenge of reconciling admirable contributions with the reprehensible actions of these figures. The need for narratives and heroes within ideologies adds complexity to the issue, making it difficult to discard the mythical figures central to an ideology while keeping its fundamental ideas intact.
The Dilemma of Hero Worship and Patriarchy
The propensity for hero worship and the cult of genius are intrinsically tied to patriarchal structures. The desire for heroes or geniuses often leads to the dismissal or denial of the patriarchal abuses committed by these figures. This in turn is driven by the anxiety of unraveling the entire fabric of patriarchy if one were to fully confront the problematic actions of admired figures. This anxiety perpetuates a mental defense mechanism that limits critical thinking beyond a certain point, preventing a thorough examination of the patriarchy's role in enabling abuse and exploitation. As a result, enablers rarely face consequences, which exemplifies how patriarchy, authority, and capitalism function as structures that protect and uphold the offenders.
Another little bonus to tide you over. Jack briefly went back to eX-Twitter to hangout in a Space with best-friend-of-the-pod Eiynah and the excellent Dr Caitlin Green to talk about Russell Brand, Lauren Boebert, Danny Masterson, the hypocrisy of those who scream about groomers, patriarchy, etc. The bit where Caitlin talks about reactions to the Brand allegations among the 'Gender Criticals' is particularly interesting. Thanks to everyone who showed up to listen and/or join-in.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
