Jonathan Hackett, a seasoned U.S. Marine with two decades in intelligence and authoring 'Theory of Irregular War,' joins Dr. Sandor Fabian, a former Hungarian Special Forces officer and defense contractor, to dissect irregular warfare. They introduce the concept of the 'dysfunctional sovereign' and critique U.S. military doctrine. Key discussions include the emotional dimensions of conflict, strategies for small nations, and the necessity of adapting military approaches by learning from historical precedents and diverse methodologies.
The concept of the 'dysfunctional sovereign' is central to understanding the dynamics of irregular warfare and its implications for state stability.
There is a critical distinction between irregular war as a state of political conflict and irregular warfare as the tactics employed within that context.
Current U.S. military doctrine needs to adapt by incorporating cultural and historical insights to improve effectiveness in irregular warfare scenarios.
Deep dives
The Concept of Irregular Warfare
Irregular warfare is characterized by a lack of universally accepted definitions, as illustrated by differing perspectives among military and academic circles. The concept emerges when a dysfunctional sovereign interferes excessively with social, political, and economic structures, causing a rift between state expectations and citizen experiences. This imbalance often leads to discontent, as citizens tolerate considerable oppression before resorting to armed resistance, making the role of the sovereign a crucial factor in the development of irregular warfare. The nature of this conflict challenges conventional military doctrines, highlighting the need for adaptable strategies that consider the unique dynamics at play.
Dysfunctional Sovereigns and Their Implications
The theory of the dysfunctional sovereign posits that an effective political order can prevent irregular warfare by ensuring stability and security for its citizens. When the state fails to uphold its end of the social contract, people may respond violently, seeking to reclaim their sovereignty and rights. This struggle often manifests as irregular warfare, where the desires of the populace clash with the oppressive actions of the state. The analysis stresses the importance of comprehending historical and socio-political contexts to understand the motivations behind these conflicts and inform more effective military responses.
Defining Irregular War vs. Warfare
A significant distinction exists between irregular war and irregular warfare—the former representing a state of political conflict and the latter the methods employed in that conflict. Irregular war involves the struggle for political and social change, often influenced by the historical context, while irregular warfare refers to tactical actions taken by combatants. This delineation underscores the necessity of understanding not only the operational aspect of conflict but also the underlying reasons driving it. Adopting this broader view can facilitate better strategic planning and improve military efficacy in dealing with irregular conflicts.
Challenges within U.S. Military Doctrine
The current U.S. military doctrine often overlooks the complexities of irregular warfare, leading to ineffective responses in diverse conflict scenarios. Recognizing insurgents as equivalent to state actors is essential to address the fundamental human dimensions of warfare, which require understanding the adversaries’ perspectives, motivations, and historical contexts. By simplifying the narrative to focus solely on conventional engagements, military strategies risk ignoring the critical interactions that shape conflicts. Strengthening the analytical framework surrounding irregular warfare demands inclusivity of perspectives that combine tactical operations with the deeper socio-political elements at play.
Recommendations for Policymakers and Practitioners
To effectively confront the multifaceted nature of irregular warfare, policymakers and military practitioners must prioritize the understanding of cultural and historical contexts surrounding conflicts. This includes fostering depth of knowledge—beyond surface-level awareness—among military personnel regarding the local dynamics in areas of operation. Additionally, establishing irregular warfare as a central tenet alongside conventional warfare in strategic reports and training can help guide future military endeavors. Enhanced intergovernmental collaboration and comprehensive education strategies can equally contribute to preparing forces for the complexities of modern conflicts.
Episode 122 examines a unique theory on Irregular War that challenges both historical and contemporary frameworks on the topic. The guests conduct an in-depth discussion and debate over the complexities of Irregular War and its implications for the U.S. in future conflicts throughout the globe.
Our guests define and discuss the various terminology commonly used amongst the irregular warfare community as the foundation for introducing the concept of the “dysfunctional sovereign.” They then debate the strengths and weaknesses of this theory of irregular war and its utility within the context of the current global threat environment. Our guests then provide insight into understanding the importance of both allied and adversarial perspectives on the subject, the shortcomings of current U.S. military doctrine related to irregular war, and how the U.S. should adapt its approach in the future. Lastly, they provide recommendations for how policymakers and practitioners can better approach irregular warfare in the future.
Jonathan Hackett is a U.S. Marine with two decades of experience running complex intelligence operations and special activities in dozens of countries across four continents. He finished his military career leading the only formal school in the Marine Corps making military advisors for our allies and partners. During his time in the Marine Corps, he held positions at the Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and Special Operations Command prior to teaching in Dam Neck, Virginia. In addition to his book Theory of Irregular War, Jonathan writes extensively on security cooperation, irregular conflicts, and clandestine intelligence activities.
Dr. Sandor Fabian is a defense Contractor at Morgan6 LLC. supporting the Irregular Warfare Center as deputy regional advisor for Europe and Africa. Dr. Fabian is a former Hungarian Special Forces officer with 20+ years of military experience and has served in multiple national and international assignments including the Assessment and Evaluation Branch head at the NATO Special Operations Headquarters. Dr. Fabian has published numerous journal articles and op-eds on resistance, special operations, small countries’ defense frameworks, U.S. security assistance programs, and is the author of the book titled, Irregular Warfare: The future Military Strategy for Small States.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
