Jobs, Security, and Survival: Is Universal Basic Income in our Future?

Conrad Shaw “So much of the labor market is driven by desperation. UBI shifts that. People can actually hold out for what they’re worth or for work that aligns with who they are.”

— Conrad Shaw

Conrad is perhaps the most unique guest I have had in the 5 year history of this show and he is on to talk about Universal Basic Income (UBI) , a very unique topic that is growing in exposure.

For almost a decade Conrad has dedicated his life and career to furthering the cause of Universal Basic Income (UBI).

In 2016 he and his wife started a documentary called Bootstraps which focuses on following families who lived through the experience of a basic income.

Since then, he has:

* Fundraised for and operated a nationwide basic income pilot

* Filmed a multi-year docuseries currently in post-production

* Co-founded Commingle, a mutual-aid platform enabling communities to self-fund their own grassroots basic income systems

* Worked extensively on messaging, outreach, and public education around income, stability, and societal transformation

I learned a lot from Conrad and our conversation debunked my own myths about UBI. So a really important part of this episode is the truth about what Universal Basic Income (UBI) actually is — and what it is not.

What Universal Basic Income (UBI) Is — And What It Isn’t

UBI is the idea that every person receives a recurring, unconditional, baseline income — a financial floor that ensures no one starts the month at zero. It is not meant to replace work or equalize everybody’s income. Instead, it shifts the starting point so people can make decisions from stability rather than desperation.

What UBI is:

* A stable, universal base-level income for all

* A platform for economic mobility and personal freedom

* A modernized, simplified social safety net

* A tool for reducing the survival-based pressure in the labor market

What UBI is not:

* It does not eliminate jobs

* It does not cap how much people can earn

* It does not remove incentives to work

* It is not a socialist equal-wealth system

UBI reframes the labor market so people compete for work based on interest, alignment, and ability, not raw financial need.

Practical Ways UBI Could Work

Conrad’s work goes beyond speculation. He has spent nearly a decade building practical UBI experiments, including the national pilot documented in Bootstraps (2016) and his current role with the Income To Support All Foundation and Commingle, a new community-driven model.

He explains that UBI can be implemented through several pathways—government programs, private pilots, or community-level mutual aid—but none are simple. A government-led UBI requires political will and rethinking how we allocate resources. Philanthropic pilots can demonstrate impact, but they’re temporary. Community models like Commingle allow people to pool and redistribute resources now, without waiting for legislation, but scaling them is challenging.

What’s clear is that executing UBI at any level is difficult, requiring trust, infrastructure, and cultural acceptance. Yet the difficulty doesn’t diminish the need. Instead, it underscores why experimentation and new models matter.

Individual Differences: Why UBI Supports People Doing What They’re Meant to Do

One of the deepest connections between Conrad’s work and mine is the concept of individual differences—the idea that every person brings a unique constellation of strengths, traits, interests, and abilities that make them naturally better suited to certain kinds of work.

When people are trapped in survival mode, those natural gifts often go unused. They pick jobs they can get, not jobs that reflect who they are. Freedom from this paradigm reshapes careers in ways that benefit both individuals and employers, allowing people to walk away from toxic or exploitative conditions and take jobs they genuinely care about, leading to better performance and engagement.

With a secure foundation, people have the psychological and financial freedom to make career decisions based on fit, not fear. This supports:

* Better alignment between person and role

* Higher engagement and intrinsic motivation

* Better workforce outcomes because people choose work that matches their abilities

* Greater societal value, as more people apply their genuine talents instead of defaulting to whatever job pays immediately

From Conrad’s perspective, this alignment is one of the most compelling aspects of UBI. When people are free to choose work that resonates with their abilities, the labor market becomes more efficient and more human. Employers gain workers who actually want to be there. Individuals gain a sense of purpose rooted in their authentic strengths.

In a world where AI, automation, and job volatility make career paths uncertain, helping people express their natural abilities becomes more important—not less.

How AI Fits Into the UBI Conversation

AI enters this conversation as both a catalyst and a complicating force. As Conrad points out, technological change is accelerating so quickly that we can no longer predict which jobs will exist, which skills will matter, or how stable any given career path will be. This uncertainty puts enormous pressure on individuals—especially those who don’t have the luxury to retrain, take risks, or weather employment gaps. UBI provides a stabilizing infrastructure in that landscape, giving people the freedom to adapt as work evolves rather than being overwhelmed by it.

AI serves the UBI concept well because it highlights the importance of individual differences:

as routine tasks get automated, the value of uniquely human abilities—creativity, empathy, problem-solving, and deep domain expertise—rises.

UBI supports people in discovering and developing those strengths, while also offering society a buffer as AI reshapes industries faster than institutions can respond. In this way, AI doesn’t replace the need for UBI—it makes the case for it even stronger.

Why Making UBI Work Matters in an Uncertain Future

We must acknowledge the reality: we are entering a period defined by instability—rapid technological change, unpredictable job markets, and widening gaps between opportunity and access. In such an environment, the old assumptions about steady careers, stable industries, and predictable pathways no longer hold.

UBI becomes a tool for resilience. It doesn’t solve every problem, but it gives people the space to adapt, learn, and navigate a chaotic future without falling into crisis. It creates room for people to pursue what they’re best suited for, rather than what pays the most simply out of need.

The conversation frames UBI not as a political ideology but as a human-centered adaptation strategy—a way to strengthen psychological well-being, improve labor market alignment, and provide society with a more stable foundation as the world accelerates around us.

The truth is that UBI isn’t easy; it’s a fight against gravity in a system not built for change, but we are entering into an unprecedented level of uncertainty in all aspects of our lives- so we need to have creative and idealistic solutions

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit charleshandler.substack.com