Yethis this, this part actually confused me, because i take it that, you know, so he he has a footnote saying that anonymous reviewers pressed him on thi o a, no that was for the other onebut. Objection number five: If people should be allowed to change their legal age, then people should be allow to change, for example, their legal height. We needi every reductio atamsoden spelled out for us like infull. In fact, the existence of this article supports the claim that legitimizing exchange has led to demanding the legalization of age change. And similarly, age change might lead to height change. So this is slippery slope,
Many of us think that art is subjective, but at the same time it seems like some artistic judgments are better than others. Do you think Crash deserved to receive an award for Best Picture? Did you like Season 2 of Ted Lasso? Well you’re wrong. So how do we reconcile these two conflicting attitudes about art? David and Tamler turn to David Hume’s classic essay Of the Standard of Taste (link in notes) for help. Will Pizarro finally see the error of his ways on Straw Dogs?
Plus a doozy of a medical ethics paper – should we allow people to change their legal age if it doesn’t match their "biological" and "emotional" age?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: