I largely agree that with new technologies are just really difficult to regulate and sort of erring on the side of not regular them too early seems good however I do think that there's a difference when there's a kind of black swan risk from a technology like for example people experimenting with making new viruses. That seems like it just threatens the whole world and like we just have to regulate that immediately. Well and what you would do is regulate the process of the environment or the controls around it and those kinds of things maybe that maybe it has to be regulated to an extreme but that is an example of where now we understand the risklike if this goes terribly wrong then it can leak out
Read the full transcript here.
How does 3D-printed food work? How do hackers and inventors think? What are some ideas that don't matter? Why are humans so driven by stories? What are the current sentiments around nuclear energy? What is an "information DMZ"? Is "cryptocurrency regulation" a contradiction in terms? What are "deep" and "shallow" technologies? How could we handle intellectual property rights more fairly?
Pablos is a hacker and inventor that runs Deep Future, a venture capital firm backing mad scientists, rogue inventors, crazy hackers, and maverick entrepreneurs who are implementing science fiction, solving big problems, and helping our species become better ancestors. Pablos is a top public speaker on technology whose TED Talks have over 30 million views. With his Deep Future Podcast, Pablos is sharing his conversations with people who understand the biggest problems in the world and the technologies that could help us solve them. Follow him on Twitter at @pablos, email him at pablos@deepfuture.tech, or find out more about him at deepfuture.tech.
Staff
Music
Affiliates