Is There Room to Disagree? | 3min snip from How to Fix the Internet

Get the app

The Philosopher King

How to Fix the Internet

chevron_right

notes

CHAPTER

Is There Room to Disagree?

Sally Kohn: Is there a risk that we, if we inject this sort of precautionary principle into what we're doing, we're actually missing out on some of the benefits of this rapid change? She says many engineers say they are just going to focus on the od and it'll be users who have to determine how to use it ethically or not. Kohn: The mere fact that people may disagree over values does not absolve us of the responsibility from thinking about those values none the less.

00:00

Transcript

chevron_right

Play full episode

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

Computer scientists often build algorithms with a keen focus on “solving the problem,” without considering the larger implications and potential misuses of the technology they’re creating. That’s how we wind up with machine learning that prevents qualified job applicants from advancing, or blocks mortgage applicants from buying homes, or creates miscarriages of justice in parole and other aspects of the criminal justice system.

James Mickens—a lifelong hacker, perennial wisecracker, and would-be philosopher-king who also happens to be a Harvard University professor of computer science—says we must educate computer scientists to consider the bigger picture early in their creative process. In a world where much of what we do each day involves computers of one sort or another, the process of creating technology must take into account the society it’s meant to serve, including the most vulnerable.

Mickens speaks with EFF's Cindy Cohn and Danny O’Brien about some of the problems inherent in educating computer scientists, and how fixing those problems might help us fix the internet.

In this episode you’ll learn about:

Why it’s important to include non-engineering voices, from historians and sociologists to people from marginalized communities, in the engineering process
The need to balance paying down our “tech debt” —cleaning up the messy, haphazard systems of yesteryear—with innovating new technologies
How to embed ethics education within computer engineering curricula so students can identify and overcome challenges before they’re encoded into new systems
Fostering transparency about how and by whom your data is used, and for whose profit
What we can learn from Søren Kierkegaard and Stan Lee about personal responsibility in technology.

If you have any feedback on this episode, please email podcast@eff.org. Please visit the site page at https://eff.org/pod207 where you’ll find resources – including links to important legal cases and research discussed in the podcast and a full transcript of the audio.

This podcast is supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation's Program in Public Understanding of Science and Technology.

Music for How to Fix the Internet was created for us by Reed Mathis and Nat Keefe of BeatMower.

This podcast is licensed Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, and includes the following music licensed Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported by their creators:

http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/djlang59/59729

http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/airtone/58703

http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/mwic/58883

http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/Skill_Borrower/41751

http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/NiGiD/62475

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.

Home Top podcasts Popular guests