Marks Is Not a Worker, Exactly Misa

He argues that when marxism became more popular than anarchism, revolutionary spirit lost the aspect of itself which prevented it from decaying into totalitarianism. He really does critique marks and marxism as being professing an ideal and being ideological,. And of course, that's blasphemy. Yet i think that's his main point. But ye, marks not a worker, exactly misa. On the very day when the cessarian revolution triumphed over the syndicalist and libertarian spirit, revolutionary thought lost in itself a counterpoise of which it cannot, without decaying, deprive itself.