I like the idea of the psyche as a dynamical system that's self organizing and capable of complexification. But i just don't quite know what to do with some of the major union claims am as a scientist. I see such a variation amongst unions. Some people take the archetypes as a deep metaphysical truth, Other people take them as pragmatic tools. They are sort of useful and helpful, but you're not deeply committed to their psychological reality. And so that's why i'm hesitante, not tryingtouht. We're going to feel this on the twentieth. The issue in staying one of the tings i like about young ens, i like how right it is
John Vervaeke answers questions live. This is the first in a series of live Q&As with Future Thinkers podcast guests.
Participation in the discussion is exclusive to Future Thinkers Premium Members. If you want to become a Member, go to http://members.futurethinkers.org/ and get access to our in-depth courses in personal evolution, private group calls, podcast extras, Q&A's with prominent thinkers, and more.
Check out our Watch Parties and Discussions of John Vervaeke's Awakening from the Meaning Crisis lecture series on YouTube.
Future Thinkers previous interview with John Vervaeke: http://www.futurethinkers.org/98
Enter our contest at http://www.futurethinkers.org/giveaway and win 6 months worth of Premium Membership, as well as 1 month supply of Qualia Nootropic Energy from Neurohacker Collective.