Demarcation Dilemmas: Science vs. Pseudoscience

This chapter explores the intricacies of the demarcation problem in science, particularly through the lens of Daryl Bem's controversial study on precognition. It critiques the methodologies in parapsychology and highlights the shifting nature of scientific classification, arguing that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The discussion emphasizes that the boundaries between science and pseudoscience are not fixed, and historical examples illustrate how perceptions can evolve based on new findings.