United States v. Skrmetti
5-4
00:00
Judicial Controversies in Trans Healthcare
This chapter critically examines a Supreme Court opinion by Clarence Thomas regarding gender dysphoria treatments for minors, highlighting a discrepancy between legislative authority and expert medical consensus. The discussion critiques how judicial interpretations can undermine established medical guidelines, particularly focusing on the implications of recent legislation in Tennessee targeting trans youth. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for judicial intervention against discrimination, drawing parallels between historical injustices and current legal battles over transgender rights.
Transcript
Play full episode
