Food politics comes up in a ter in marian nessell's book, food politics. Proctor and gamble is exactly the least michael hobbs in his garage i know this world has ever seen. And the fda essentially has no power to run its own studies. It's all about this binary distinction, does it cause harm or doesn't it cause harm? If it doesn't cause harm, then you can put it on the market regardless of whether it does what it's supposed to do. At no point during this entire 25 year, 20 thousand human subject study process do they test, does o'lester help people lose weight? So they're like, it will make