The Argument From Pain and Pleasure

Cameron says he has been given nothing resembling an actual objection to respond to here. Cameron's misstep strips god of his unlimited power and resources by wrongly assuming these xperiences or their provision, would somehow entail a deep deception on the part of god with respect to horendus evils. According to cameron, there simply are no soul destroying evils, because when the after life is considered, these evils are ultimately defeated when integrated into amo ly valuable whole. An eternal heaven may compensate some victims of herendus evil, but it does not justify the fact that it was allowed to occur in the first place. You don't explanatory merit by adding philosophically unmotivated details