Presidential Powers and Motives: Core vs. Non-core Debate

Analysis of the intersection between personal motives and core presidential powers, examining the debate on how motives should impact actions such as appointing principal officers. The conversation delves into the implications of criminal law regulations on presidential motives, reflecting on past cases and concerns about targeting political opponents. The chapter also explores the potential consequences of investigations and prosecutions on the presidency, comparing past independent council structures and emphasizing the fairness of the investigative process.