Matthew shragg is an expert in looking at western blots to see if there are telltale signs of doctrine. Image after image after image sho showed signs of doctorine. Expert after expert agreed that macrag's analysis was cogent and it raised really serious questions. After the break, we'll actually speak with one of the co authors of the original two thousand six study and try to get some answers.
This past July, a bombshell report in Science magazine suggested that a key Alzheimer’s study might have contained manipulated evidence. What does this mean for over a decade's worth of research? And where does the field go from here?
For more, go to http://vox.com/unexplainable
It’s a great place to view show transcripts and read more about the topics on our show.
Also, email us! unexplainable@vox.com
We read every email.
Support Unexplainable by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices