i used to be the most pessimistic person in the room, i'm a sort of democracy doom hipster. I worried about democracy before it was cool as a result. And so much more worogly, much more thoroughly than pessimists like me had predicted. Am, they we're both rong. But what happened is much more extreme than what i predicted. That's bhat, republicans just flipt bsad, you know what? Trumpets were popular. This is clearly where we at now. As basians, i think we should therefore also uplat our probability of similar shifts happening in our institutions. We've definitely undergone a change from thinking that that kind of disaster
Both words in the phrase "liberal democracy" carry meaning, and both concepts are under attack around the world. "Democracy" means that they people rule, while "liberal" (in this sense) means that the rights of individuals are protected, even if they're not part of the majority. Recent years have seen the rise of an authoritarian/populist political movement in many Western democracies, one that scapegoats minorities in the name of the true "will of the people." Yascha Mounk is someone who has been outspoken from the start about the dangers posed by this movement, and what those of us who support the ideals of liberal democracy can do about it. Among other things, we discuss how likely it is that liberal democracy could ultimately fail even in as stable a country as the United States. Yascha Mounk received his Ph.D. in Government from Harvard University. He is a Lecturer on Government at Harvard, a Senior Fellow in the Political Reform Program at New America, and Executive Director at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. His most recent book is The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.