I think about this idea of fluidity of thought, right? Like imagine that you're trying to do calculus but you have to look up the definition of derivative every time. Not all ideas are like that but some are. I also just wanted to point out that even with the memory thing you need to know that there's something worth looking up and that actually is not necessarily obvious in all cases. There's so much of what we're talking about depends a great deal on the cost of memory.
Read the full transcript here.
How can we accelerate learning? Is spaced repetition the best way to absorb information over the long term? Do we always read non-fiction works with the goal of learning? What are some less common but perhaps more valuable types of information that can be put on flash cards? What sorts of things are worth remembering anyway? Why is it important to commit some ideas to memory when so much information is easily findable on the internet? What benefits are derived from being involved in all stages of a project pipeline from concept to execution (as opposed to being involved only in one part, like the research phase)? Why should more researchers be involved in para-academic projects? Where can one find funding for para-academic research?
Andy Matuschak invents tools that expand what people can think and do. His current research focuses on a new written medium which makes it much easier to remember what you read. In previous roles, Andy led R&D at Khan Academy and helped build iOS at Apple. You can read more about his work at andymatuschak.org and follow him on Twitter at @andy_matuschak.
Staff
Music
Affiliates