The essay defends a version of atheistic existentialism, although he doesn't think you have to do that. He says if you don't embrace that, then you're essentially not acting in good faith. You know, what follows from those three per cent central tenatt and is it something to be upset about? Is it optimistic? Is a pessimistic? Is it moral? Is it immoral? Like, those are the things, but as the central starting corps can to, that's what i din't write.
David and Tamler don black turtlenecks and light up a couple of Gauloises to talk about Jean Paul Sartre's classic essay “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Why are choices so fundamental to our experience? What does Sartre mean when he says that “existence precedes essence”? Why does he try to shoehorn universalizability into a view that’s clearly hostile to it?
Plus, how much free time is good for you? Is that even the right question?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: