The Difference Between a Review and a Metter Analysis

A review article is where people look over all the research. It's more of an opinionated piece from the research that they understand, giving their critiques and synthesis in a paper in sections. A meter analysis should be, isn't always should be more statistical in nature. But again, there's no conclusion in science. There is just a general consensus at the time. Because a year may go by, someone does a research study, and then suddenly, oh, everything we thought we knew is either potentially wrong, or we need have a lok at these methods. Why did did this happen? Did they cheat it? Did they bias it? Like, what's going on?