I do find it quite frustrating when people aren't willing to really engage in a deeper conversation about their premises. One thing doing the podcast is really emphasized for me is that people struggle without concrete examples. So I try to remind my podcast guests that you really need to bring examples to talk about the ideas.
Read the full transcript here.
Is it possible to be both agreeable and skeptical in conversations? How can you give feedback and challenge people constructively without triggering their automatic self-defense mechanisms? More generally, how can you challenge people intellectually without riling them up emotionally? What skills are needed to be able to have detailed, productive conversations across a wide range of topics? How can you push through plateaus in the process of self-improvement? What are podcasts as a medium good for?
Find more about Spencer through his website, spencergreenberg.com.
Staff
Music
Affiliates