Is There Sufficient Evidence to Meet the Elements of the Tennessee Statute?

Don't conflate the two very important questions here. One question, is the elements met, recognizing that these statutes exist? And a second question that i think in the media and kind of the response to this particular case has conflated is the kind of broader, more philosophical question, should these laws exist at all? Redon de vot never made a decision that was necessarily as culpable as drinking and getting into a car. Now, she made decisions, and she did things, and she didn't do things that resulted in this person's death, but nothing like that.