Is the Kasiastic Structure Superior to the Cis?

How you interpret petra, whether you have the same reference as in petros or not, it seems to me that's going to determine where the kim is. So i would not put very much weight on the kyastic structure. The natural way to read this is ultimately not about whether there is a cam here or not. All of that points to peter being the rock, whether this was structured giastically or not. I don't think my articulation of the cis is, you know, superior. It's the one that would be the most obvious to someone who looks at units of meaning instead of counting verbs within the units of meaning.