Moral choices, i think, often are framed or communicated as rules that are unbending. But we can still feel very comfortable saying we can judge these dums. You know, we're not saying we're definitely right, but we're making judgments,. We're making a valuate of judgments there. I mean, no, wonder if it's true of frederick. Maybe it is.
David and Tamler don black turtlenecks and light up a couple of Gauloises to talk about Jean Paul Sartre's classic essay “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Why are choices so fundamental to our experience? What does Sartre mean when he says that “existence precedes essence”? Why does he try to shoehorn universalizability into a view that’s clearly hostile to it?
Plus, how much free time is good for you? Is that even the right question?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: