Light as Paul, Is It Reinforcing the Non-Eexistent Thing?

There's a presupposing of an unexistent thing being existing, really? So the existence or the seeing gets mixed up with the body and then the idea of the seer arises. And it says, if this is the case, your spiritual practices themselves are reinforcing the non-existent thing. How can they destroy it? Yeah. Light taken to be something else, being put to use to look for itself reinforces to something else that we're not. That which is enlightened, the appearance of Paul says, I'm not enlightened, now seeks for enlightenment and it drives it crazy.