Is There a Universal Consistency in Modern Moral Philosophy?

I was really impressed by her as not so much in the critical parts of modern moral philosophy where she's discounting content, et cetera. But in her positive arguments, I mean, this is a good example of what analytic philosophy should read like. It can compartmentalize in the way you're talking about and speak to different audiences in different essays. And obviously owes a lot to Wittgenstein, but still strikes me as much more organized and intentional.