I think the 1960s still produce a hangover for almost every fight we have today. And you can only understand that if you understand how disruptive the 1960s were in community after community across the US. I don't know that there's any way we could do justice to a question that big and under a couple of hours. But maybe just a few big glosses. Both parties were very right for hostile takeover. The Republican party is too vacuous of what we stand for right now. So it was right for a hostile takeover. That happened. Then you ended up with what was perceived as a choice for voters between two candidates that were not viewed as very trustworthy. It would be fair