Do You Think the Department of Justice Should Prosecute Mark Meadows?

I think this is a very different analysis from the analysis that the department of justice engaged in when it made a decision to indict steve bannon for contempt of congress. You have mark meadows who not only was employed by the white house, but he was president trump's chief of staff during the insurrection. So how does it cut because meadows could say, well, i co operated with the committee, but now we've reached a point where i can't turn it over any more and i can't discuss any of this? I mean, is it in his favor that he turned over nine thousand pages, or it cut against him?