We'll keep thinking about ways to either prove that there is some inherent superlineal lure bound on the size of arguments in the ranomical model, or we can improve the upper bound with like, better constructions. This kind of goes to the question, like, how you're picking what you're doing. But do you look at a protocol and then, like, there's pieces of it, and you start to optimize or think about specific pieces? Is it more like you're starting with a clean slate and you're trying to kind of build something brand new? I wat definitely not a clean slate. That would the would da wyelsi iter i think a common theme that

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode