All scientists, no matter who they are getting their funding from, have pressure to produce results. And i think that's part of the pressure that leads to things like pea hacking. You've collected all this data, and it's not statistically significant with respect to the hypothesis that you thought you were testing. So what do you do now? Well, let me just see if many of my athe dait different way of i slice ad indice it.
In this interview, based on her landmark book, Why Trust Science?, historian of science Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength — and the greatest reason we can trust it. Drawing vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong, Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy.