Jane Law Afadevit Brief: What Is the Equivalent of Section 132?

It has 66 verses once again What it appears that she's referring to is verses 52 through 54 And yeah, can we get lindsey could you read this versus 52 through 54 Sure and let mine handmade emma smith receive all those that have been given unto my servant joseph and who are virtuous and pure before me. She shall be destroyed say at the lord For I am the lord thy god and will destroy her if she abide not in my law So if you go back to the jane law afadevit brief though it is And set forth that those women who would not allow their husbands to have more wives than one should be under condemnation be for god okay, so

Play episode from 01:38:39

chevron_right

Transcript

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

There is a raging debate within Mormon circles where those folks who are determined to maintain belief in the Prophet Joseph Smith but who abhor polygamy and the Church as ran by Brigham Young and after have found ways to dismiss the standard evidence that Mormonism’s founder was a polygamist. They interpret the evidence as made up by Brigham Young and those around him in an effort to draw Joseph Smith into a practice he never participated in. Stories of fabricating history, backdating prophesy, and discrediting witnesses. On this week’s episode Bill & RFM with a few friends take a look at the evidence and to see if one has compelling reasons to believe Joseph Smith was, in fact, a polygamist!

MAIN CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM REASON

1.) Clayton Journal Entries can be shown to be reliable

2.) D&C 132 is shown to be reliable as the text of the revelation that Smith received

3.) There is substantial Evidence that imposes that Smith originated and perpetuated Polygamy

4.) Hyrum Smith read the revelation in a High Council Meeting and Joseph and Hyrum tried to excuse the revelation away in the Nauvoo City Council but not a the way that allows Polygamy deniers to impose a narrative of “Eternity Only Sealings” or “Dynastic Sealings”. Hence they must confront why Hyrum and Joseph don’t respond using the narrative they have created.

5.) That any attempt to explain Joseph’s practice as “eternal only” and not time is irrational in light of Hyrum and Joseph’s attempt to walk back the doctrine/revelation of plural marriage by explaining it was in regards to former times and had nothing to do with the present. In other words Dynastic Sealings or relationships in the hereafter that are not binding or sexual in this life is not going to strike fear and anger and rebelliousness in Emma, along with pushback and resentment in Marks, Cowles, and Soby and can be explained without embarrassment. But when Joseph and Hyrum tip their hand by making the excuse that this revelation is about former times and not the present, we can rationally conclude this wasn’t eternal only or dynastic relationships that lacked sex or marriage in this life.(While we didn’t show it, Orange Wight’s autobiography also imposes that Smith had Flora Woodworth as a wife and he was notified that because of such, she was taken. Hence this wasn’t a eternity only relationship.)

If you want to see the documents and the notes about what these documents show. Check out the three part Reddit Posts on the topic..

Part 1:
https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/144aaam/the_evidence_laid_out_that_joseph_smith_was_the/

Part 2:
https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/144ahjo/the_evidence_laid_out_that_joseph_smith_was_the/

Part 3:
https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/144aqlr/the_evidence_laid_out_that_joseph_smith_was_the/

RESOURCES:

https://www.yearofpolygamy.com/year-of-polygamy/episode-94-polygamy-controversies-joseph-fought-polygamy/

https://www.yearofpolygamy.com/year-of-polygamy/episode-139-joseph-didnt-fight-polygamy-part-one/

https://www.yearofpolygamy.com/uncategorized/episode-139-joseph-didnt-fight-polygamy-part-two/

https://sunstone.org/e41-brigham-young-and-the-chamber-of-secrets/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZQwyhhFczU

https://www.jstor.org/stable/24243807
This link has the url’s for the Land Deeds of Joseph’s plural wives

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/y90sbz/joseph_smith_acted_unethically_giving_away_church/

https://archive.org/details/history-of-the-saints-1842-john-c-bennett/page/n9/mode/2up?view=theater – John C Bennett History of the Saints

http://www.latterdaytruth.org/pdf/100526.pdf Nauvoo Expositor