Presidential Immunity and Legal Precedents

This chapter dissects the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its implications, showcasing the historical context and the complexities involved in holding former presidents accountable for their actions. It highlights the lack of absolute immunity for ex-presidents and explores the fear of post-office prosecution in light of past administrations' track records on war crimes and abuses of power. The discussion navigates through legal precedents, conspiracy cases, and the elite consensus in Washington to shield past presidents from legal consequences, ultimately questioning the principle of presidents acting above the law.