The Case of Andrew Fitzherbert

In march two thousand, andrew fitz herbert lodged an appeal claiming that the results of d an a testing were falsified in order to convict him. In their ruling, the court of appeal concluded that the blood based evidence implicating andrew in kathleen's murder, while unexplained, was enough to support the conviction. As such, the appeal was rejected. Four years later, in february two thousand four, andrew applied to have the crimeseng samples re tested at another facility in western australia. He requested other items, such as the shoes found under the clinic sink, also be re examined. They were originally taken for analysis, and dried blood was sw