Challenging Google's Dominance

19min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This chapter examines the implications of the Google monopoly case and the effectiveness of proposed remedies, such as choice screens for search engines. The discussion highlights the complexities of antitrust actions against major tech companies, the challenges of public awareness, and the limited impact of current regulations. It also explores radical ideas like expropriation as a potential solution to address the systemic issues created by corporate monopolies.

Paris Marx is joined by Rob Larson to discuss the recent ruling that Google is a monopolist, what consequences it might face, and what lessons we can learn from the Microsoft antitrust case in the early 2000s.

Rob Larson is the author of Mastering the Universe: The Obscene Wealth of the Ruling Class, What They Do with Their Money, and Why You Should Hate Them Even More and Professor of Economics at Tacoma Community College.

Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its worldview, and wider society with the goal of inspiring people to demand better tech and a better world. Support the show on Patreon.

The podcast is made in partnership with The Nation. Production is by Eric Wickham. Transcripts are by Brigitte Pawliw-Fry.

Also mentioned in this episode:

Rob has written about the Google antitrust case and its likely outcomes.
Paris also wrote about why it won’t solve the problems with the internet.
Watch a highlight reel of Bill Gates' deposition on YouTube.
Google has been deemed to have an illegal monopoly in online search.
A second trial over Google’s monopolistic position in the online ads market is ongoing.
The Obama administration let Google off the hook a decade ago.
Some tech billionaire donors are pushing Kamala Harris to remove Lina Khan as head of the Federal Trade Commission if she becomes president.