The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms

In two thousand eight, the court essentially concluded that enow the prefatory clause that mentiones militia service was kind of like they just threw that in there wa surplusage. So it's not just like every individual gets a right to keep and bear arms, like it's in conjunction with this militia service rite. The supreme court believes you have a constitutional right to carry a weapon in public for the purposes of self defence. But could you help us understand the seeming contradiction between a supreme court, which says now that states have very limited authority regulate whether you can carry a weapon  in public? I will ask this question, then i will step back and let you do your work.