Board Oversight at a Time of Political and Geopolitical Uncertainty
The Informed Board
U.S. role and global paradigm uncertainty
Kevin discusses changing U.S. behavior, uncertainty about the next paradigm, and competing global players jockeying for position.
The economic playing field is being reordered. What does that mean for boards?
“Decisions that are being made today are going to be existential to the long-term viability of the companies that they're overseeing,” suggests Kevin Kajiwara, co-president of Political Risk Advisory at Teneo, who advises Fortune 100 CEOs on geopolitical risks and their strategic implications.
Kevin joins Michael Leiter, head of Skadden’s National Security Practice, and host Ann Beth Stebbins, a Skadden M&A partner, in a conversation about how boards can effectively exercise oversight in today's geopolitical environment.
The U.S. had a remarkably consistent role shaping the general economic trajectory of the regulated free market for decades, Kevin says, but that playing field is now being reshaped, and “boards need to ask themselves if the type of economic actors that prevailed during the previous period will continue to be the preeminent actors going forward.” It is not yet clear what shape the new global paradigm will take, he says.
Mike emphasizes that political risk is no longer just dinner conversation at board retreats. Political decisions around the globe directly impact quarterly results, annual performance and future viability through effects on supply chains, tariffs, technology controls and data access. Business decision in one region now trigger counter-reactions from other jurisdictions. “If boards aren't thinking about it in those terms — the political decisions around the globe that will have direct impact on their quarter, on their year, on their viability in the future — they're not very good boards, and the company may not be around very long,” he says.
Boards can no longer focus only on the fundamentals of a company, because too much depends on external, political factors, he says. And political risk is no longer limited to the consequences of the next election.
Both guests recommend that boards incorporate international expertise when evaluating their own composition. Boards should also institute regular updates from management on geopolitical risks, and consider conducting scenario planning exercises to test management assumptions. Companies should review and update disclosures, including risk factors, to demonstrate board engagement and support management in navigating an increasingly complex global environment.
💡 Meet Your Host 💡
Name: Ann Beth Stebbins
Title: Partner at Skadden
Connect: LinkedIn
💡 Featured Guests💡
Name: Mike Leiter
Title: Partner, National Security; CFIUS; Cybersecurity and Data Privacy; Congressional Investigations; Artificial Intelligence, Skadden
Connect: LinkedIn
Name: Kevin Kajiwara
Title: Co-President, Political Risk Advisory, Teneo
Connect: LinkedIn
Connect with Skadden
☑️ Subscribe to The Informed Board on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favorite podcast app.
☑️ Let us know what topics you would like to hear about on The Informed Board by reaching out to us at info@skadden.com.
The Informed Board is a podcast by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, and Affiliates. This podcast is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This podcast is considered advertising under applicable state laws.
The AI-powered Podcast Player
