In face books defense, it is impossible to plete police billions of people using a platform. So i don't think that they're responsible for a billion people's behavior on their platform. When an editor looks at something and says, this should be on the home page of the new york times or c nd n, they now have inherited a some amount of responsibility for that content. I think th wher we'll wind up is the algorithm having to explain why it put something up there ahead of you. If they had to explain the algorithm, you'd be basely educating the public on why they're seeing that, and then giving them ability to turn it off. That is

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode