The Negative Effects of Studying Art in Florence

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

I'm definitely not the most famous person in your field there. There are a lot of very awesome people there. But you have to constantly be doing like, I love the sides. So you're constantly doing this awesome science as well. You've always got to kind of prove them wrong. It comes back to that earlier points about it being negative. People think of you and judge you just for that. If everyone's going to push me out for writing this, then more power to another institution that gets me.

Jessica Wade is a physicist at Imperial College London who, while spending her day working on special carbon-based materials that can be used as semiconductors, has spent her nights writing nearly 2,000 Wikipedia entries about underrepresented figures in science. That, along with numerous other forms of public engagement—including writing a children’s book about nanotechnology—is all in an effort to actually do something productive to correct gender and racial biases in STEM.

She joined Tyler to discuss if there are any useful gender stereotypes in science, distinguishing between productive and unproductive ways to encourage women in science, whether science Twitter is biased toward men, how AI will affect gender participation gaps, how Wikipedia should be improved, how she judges the effectiveness of her Wikipedia articles, how she’d improve science funding, her work on chiral materials and its near-term applications, whether writing a kid’s science book should be rewarded in academia, what she learned spending a year studying art in Florence, what she’ll do next, and more.

Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video.

Recorded February 21st, 2023

Other ways to connect

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram
Follow Tyler on Twitter
Follow Jess on Twitter
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.