If only poker players voted, how would the country be different? It's not a question about party affiliation, but about how poker players think. Because your reason for why you vote is going to matter more than which party you vote for. So i was talking about some of the moresubtle tells, like, once you tring tof get tothe the expert level of poker. There's a very reliable tell when people are new to poker that i would use every single time....
For Annie Duke, the poker table is a perfect laboratory to study human decision-making — including her own. “It really exposes you to the way that you’re thinking,” she says, “how hard it is to avoid decision traps, even when you’re perfectly well aware that those decision traps exist. And how easy it is for like your mind to slip into those traps.” She’s spent a lot of time studying human cognition at the poker table and off it — her best-known academic article is about psycholinguistics and her forthcoming book is titled How to Decide: Simple Tools for Making Better Choices.
Annie joined Tyler to explore how payoffs aren’t always monetary, the benefits and costs of probabilistic thinking, the “magical thinking” behind why people buy fire insurance but usually don’t get prenups, the psychology behind betting on shark migrations, how her most famous linguistics paper took on Steven Pinker, how public policy would change if only the top 500 poker players voted, why she wasn’t surprised to lose Celebrity Apprentice to Joan Rivers, whether Trump has a tell, the number one trait of top poker players, and more.
Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video.
Recorded June 24th, 2020 Other ways to connect