I was a core member of what Farrell would call a collaborative circle: the four people who codified Context-Driven Testing. That makes me think I can supplement Farrell's account with what it feels like to be inside a circle. I try to be "actionable", not just some guy writing a memoir.
My topics are: what the context-driven circle was reacting against; the nature of the reaction and the resulting shared vision; how geographically-distributed circles work (including the first-wave feminist Ultras and the Freud/Fleiss collaboration); two meeting formats you may want to copy; why I value shared techniques over shared vision; how circles develop a shared tone and stereotyped reactions, not just a shared vision; and, the nature of “going public” with the vision.
Mentioned
- Michael P. Farrell, Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work, 2001.
- Cem Kaner, Jack Falk, and Hung Quoc Nguyen, Testing Computer Software, 1993.
- Édouard Manet, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (The Luncheon on the Grass), 1863.
- context-driven-testing.com (including the principles of context-driven testing), 2001?
- Cem Kaner, James Bach, Bret Pettichord, Lessons Learned in Software Testing: a Context-Driven Approach, 2002.
- Association for Software Testing.
- Elisabeth Hendrickson, Explore It! Reduce Risk and Increase Confidence with Exploratory Testing, 2012.
- Jonathan Bach, "Session-Based Test Management", 2000.
- Patrick O'Brian, Post Captain, 1972. (It's the second in a series that begins with Master and Commander.)
Four articles that demonstrate personal style:
- James Bach, “Enough About Process, What We Need Are Heroes”, IEEE Software, March 1995.
- Brian Marick, "New Models for Test Development", 1999.
- Bret Pettichord, "Testers and Developers Think Differently", 2000.
- James Bach, "Explaining Testing to THEM", 2001.
Los Altos Workshop on Software Testing and related:
Image credit
The image is the painting Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.
