Is he saying that a work of art, once produced, can be evaluated? I like, contextualy, we can say, this picaso, this was good, or this was bad, without having to say, a priori, what pecasso should have painted. All these things came through his spontaneous, creative act of will. And would not have, you know, nobody could have said, all right, i think this is, this is what will make for a value, valuable pacaso work. That had to just emerge as he did it.
David and Tamler don black turtlenecks and light up a couple of Gauloises to talk about Jean Paul Sartre's classic essay “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Why are choices so fundamental to our experience? What does Sartre mean when he says that “existence precedes essence”? Why does he try to shoehorn universalizability into a view that’s clearly hostile to it?
Plus, how much free time is good for you? Is that even the right question?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: