I don't think I understand what it means to be no smarter than human. Current AI systems are often superhuman in specific ways, right? Like, you know, even deep blue, the old chess playing engine was superhuman applying chess,. And then you have something like chat GPT, which is superhuman in the sense that it's read more information than any human has ever read. A better way to say this is solves problems the way a human solves them. Many of these are very superhuman. So not at all how humans do it.
Read the full transcript here.
Does AI pose a near-term existential risk? Why might existential risks from AI manifest sooner rather than later? Can't we just turn off any AI that gets out of control? Exactly how much do we understand about what's going on inside neural networks? What is AutoGPT? How feasible is it to build an AI system that's exactly as intelligent as a human but no smarter? What is the "CoEm" AI safety proposal? What steps can the average person take to help mitigate risks from AI?
Connor Leahy is CEO and co-founder of Conjecture, an AI alignment company focused on making AI systems boundable and corrigible. Connor founded and led EleutherAI, the largest online community dedicated to LLMs, which acted as a gateway for people interested in ML to upskill and learn about alignment. With capabilities increasing at breakneck speed, and our ability to control AI systems lagging far behind, Connor moved on from the volunteer, open-source Eleuther model to a full-time, closed-source model working to solve alignment via Conjecture.
Staff
Music
Affiliates