AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The Importance of Proving an Idiot in Court
Arpio never brought up the timelines which again were the faxes with the weird typewriting on the back Or other documents mont gumery had made that included judge snow. He's admitted in court that this guy is a complete and total fraud Yeah, but also admitted that he kept working with him or his department keep working with him. This is again This is like the marilla panfascia situation You should be allowed to prove in court that arpio is an idiot. I think it is a legal imperative.