The right of the punisher seems to depend on some notion that the agent that committed the crime deserves to be punished. So maybe then if he's saying retributivism that is motivated by some form of content or Rawlsian notion cannot stand and he's limiting it to that, then it makes more sense. I feel like there are other versions of retributivism as a theory of punishment that could just be limited to just saying you the state has the right to punish anybody who deserves that punishment. You don't need to have arrived at your judgment of dessert in a content way. It might not be vulnerable to this kind of critique, although it also might depending on how our reactive attitudes

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode