Is This a Verbatim Reproduction of Boyd's Essay?

In the book, osinga has reproduced verbatim boyd's essay with a footnotes that he has written himself. So it's very much like a classic like here is the text, and you get the interpreter's point of view in the footnotes. It's only in the section on destruction and creation that boyd's work is presented verbatim. And the other stuff is osinga's interpretation, and that isn't marked out in any clear way. But even the estruction creation heading the introduction, is still written by osinga, even though it's not tacked as such.