Inconsistent and Repugnant
Advisory Opinions
00:00
Exploring Inconsistent and Repugnant Verdicts
This chapter delves into the complexities of inconsistent and repugnant verdicts in a murder trial in Georgia. The hosts discuss the argument brought to the Supreme Court and question whether it is a state process or a violation of federal constitutional protection against being tried twice for the same offense. They analyze the implications and potential scenarios, providing insights into the justices' interests and the challenges faced by oral advocates.
Play episode from 01:31
Transcript
