
DEBATE: Dr Ben Burgis Vs Stuart Knechtle | Evidence for a God? | Podcast
Modern-Day Debate
00:00
Is There a Way to Fit God in This Paradise?
Gadel's incompleteness, theorm as i suppose to kirkade is a austrian ethic. Theorems from early twentieth century are supposed to show that you can't have a system that's both a complete inconsistent and internally consistent. You're always going to have things that seem to be true that aren't provable within the system. Some people will draw big conclusions about a no philosophy of mind - I'm pretty sceptical about those arguments. If theyr's stuff that you can’t justify, are you still allowed to say there are some things that are probably not true? And i certainly hope so. Because if you can't still say, well, here
Transcript
Play full episode