Analyses of SMU vs. Baylor: Key Performance Indicators and Strategies

Griffin Warner and Lonte Smith talk college football betting for Week 2.

The Week 2 preview of the College Football Podcast on RJ Bell’s Pregame network opened with energy, emphasizing fast offense, swarming defense, and relentless hustle. Griffin Warner and Lonte Smith immediately addressed Week 1 results, acknowledging that it wasn’t the strongest start but pointing to process over outcome. They stressed closing line value as a long-term indicator, comparing it to stock market performance, and noted that Week 1 was dominated by unders, with many offenses struggling to find rhythm. Quarterback uncertainty remained the headline, with Arch Manning’s rocky debut sparking debate. Warner went as far as to call him potentially the most overrated quarterback of all time, while Smith defended him by pointing out the caliber of Ohio State’s elite defense.

The discussion then shifted to broader conference takeaways. The ACC impressed in Week 1, particularly Florida State’s big win, while Clemson’s struggles stood out. Cal’s freshman quarterback also earned praise for a breakout performance. The panel agreed that the top of the ACC looks strong with Florida State, Clemson, Duke, and Georgia Tech, while the bottom remains unsettled.

From there, the show broke down marquee Week 2 matchups. SMU versus Baylor set the stage, with Baylor’s defensive front and ability to stop explosive plays highlighted as key factors. Despite SMU entering as a small favorite, Smith leaned Baylor’s way, questioning whether SMU had shown enough balance to justify the line. Next, the heated Iowa–Iowa State rivalry came into focus. The history of low-scoring slugfests made the under 41.5 an attractive play. Smith backed Iowa State’s improved offense under Rocco Beck but insisted the real value lay in expecting another defensive battle.

Illinois against Duke was another spotlight game. Both teams leaned on defense, but Duke’s elite secondary and Manny Diaz’s blitz-heavy schemes tilted the panel’s confidence toward the Blue Devils. Warner emphasized that road favorites early in the season are often overvalued, making Duke’s home underdog status particularly appealing.

The nightcap, Michigan versus Oklahoma, focused on defensive dominance. Brent Venables’ track record of confusing quarterbacks and Michigan’s conservative freshman game plan pointed to another under. Smith’s best angle was the first-half under 23.5, predicting a slow start with heavy ground games, limited big plays, and quarterbacks trying to settle in against relentless defenses.

The show wrapped with best bets. Smith locked in Florida minus 17.5 against South Florida, pointing to mismatches in the trenches, Lagway’s deep-ball ability, and Florida’s familiarity with the spread concepts USF runs. Warner sided with the Iowa–Iowa State under 41.5, banking on punts, field position battles, and Kirk Ferentz’s trademark conservative approach.

Overall, the podcast captured the essence of early-season handicapping: balancing small-sample overreactions with long-term process discipline. Week 1 brought surprises, quarterback drama, and defensive dominance, but Week 2 promised opportunities with sharp numbers, classic rivalries, and critical matchups that could shape conference races. Whether it was Florida’s talent edge, Duke’s defensive identity, or the under trend in rivalry games, the conversation blended data, betting insight, and storytelling, giving listeners a comprehensive game plan heading into Saturday.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices