Direct Action

A lot of people get various, various justifications for calling pretty effective acts of direct action, and questioning their legitimacy. I think some of this comes from cause there's, obviously, there's the bad faith elements of this a. But i think the good faith folks who question it, there's a lot of learned helplessness there this itea that because somebody did carry out a, a a pretty successful direct action attack then it has to have been the fbi, or whoever, right? Because a, obviously the left could never have pulled off something as as cunning as throwing a single mollet off at a building and spray painting the side of it, you know? A, and