A Final Answer That Doesn't Call Out for Further Explanation

Reaching a final answer that doesn't call out for further explanation might have a lot to do with our world view rather than an ontological standard. In the paper, i cite a a nice paper by a friend of mine, dan corman, called law necessitarianism and the importance of being intuitive. And so you might worry that if we're discounting our motal intuitions here, if we're saying, like, gosh, things seem a certain way to me, but they're not actually athen,. You might worry that this is going to generate too much scepticism about how things seem to us. Science is in the business of delivering facts, not feelings or appearances